syntactic$81222$ - перевод на греческий
Diclib.com
Словарь ChatGPT
Введите слово или словосочетание на любом языке 👆
Язык:

Перевод и анализ слов искусственным интеллектом ChatGPT

На этой странице Вы можете получить подробный анализ слова или словосочетания, произведенный с помощью лучшей на сегодняшний день технологии искусственного интеллекта:

  • как употребляется слово
  • частота употребления
  • используется оно чаще в устной или письменной речи
  • варианты перевода слова
  • примеры употребления (несколько фраз с переводом)
  • этимология

syntactic$81222$ - перевод на греческий

COMPOSITE MATERIAL
Syntactic foams; Syntactic Foams
  • oceanographic mooring]].

syntactic      
adj. συντακτικός
syntax analysis         
  • Flow of data in a typical parser
  •  url=https://archive.org/details/cprogramminglang00bria }} (Appendix A.13 "Grammar", p.193 ff)</ref> ''Bottom:'' a parser has digested the tokens "<syntaxhighlight lang="c" inline>int v;main(){</syntaxhighlight>" and is about choose a rule to derive ''Stmt''. Looking only at the first lookahead token "<syntaxhighlight lang="c" inline>v</syntaxhighlight>", it cannot decide which of both alternatives for ''Stmt'' to choose; the latter requires peeking at the second token.
PROCESS OF ANALYZING A STRING OF SYMBOLS, EITHER IN NATURAL LANGUAGE, COMPUTER LANGUAGES OR DATA STRUCTURES, CONFORMING TO THE RULES OF A FORMAL GRAMMAR
Syntax analysis; Syntactical analysis; Parsers; Parseable; Parsing (human languages); Syntactic Analysis; Syntactic analysis; Parser 3; Parser; Parse; Syntactic parsing; Grammar parser; Parsable; Natural language parsing; Parsed; HTML parser; Natural language parser; List of parser development software; Parsing algorithms; Parsing algorithm; English parser; SyntaxNet; Parsing of natural language; Lookahead (parsing); Parsers for natural languages; Graph parsing; Mechanical layout
συντακτική ανάλυση

Определение

syntactic sugar
Term coined by Peter Landin for additions to the syntax of a language which do not affect its expressiveness but make it "sweeter" for humans to use. Syntactic sugar gives the programmer an alternative way of coding that is more succinct or more like some familiar notation. It does not affect the expressiveness of the formalism (compare chrome). Syntactic sugar can be easily translated ("desugared") to produce a program in some simpler "core" syntax. E.g. C's "a[i]" notation is syntactic sugar for "*(a + i)". In a (curried) functional language, all operators are really functions and the use of infix notation "x+y" is syntactic sugar for function application "(+) x y". Alan Perlis once quipped, "Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon." The variants "syntactic saccharin" and "syntactic syrup" are also recorded. These denote something even more gratuitous, in that they serve no purpose at all. Compare candygrammar, syntactic salt.

Википедия

Syntactic foam

Syntactic foams are composite materials synthesized by filling a metal, polymer, or ceramic matrix with hollow spheres called microballoons or cenospheres or non-hollow spheres (e.g. perlite). In this context, "syntactic" means "put together." The presence of hollow particles results in lower density, higher specific strength (strength divided by density), lower coefficient of thermal expansion, and, in some cases, radar or sonar transparency. A manufacturing method for low density syntactic foams is based on the principle of buoyancy.

The term was originally coined by the Bakelite Company, in 1955, for their lightweight composites made of hollow phenolic microspheres bonded to a matrix of phenolic, epoxy, or polyester.

Tailorability is one of the biggest advantages of these materials. The matrix material can be selected from almost any metal, polymer, or ceramic. Microballoons are available in a variety of sizes and materials, including glass microspheres, cenospheres, carbon, and polymers. The most widely used and studied foams are glass microspheres (in epoxy or polymers), and cenospheres or ceramics (in aluminium). One can change the volume fraction of microballoons or use microballoons of different effective density, the latter depending on the average ratio between the inner and outer radii of the microballoons.

The compressive properties of syntactic foams, in most cases, strongly depend on the properties of microballoons. In general, the compressive strength of the material is proportional to its density.

The matrix material has more influence on the tensile properties. Tensile strength may be highly improved by a chemical surface treatment of the particles, such as silanization, which allows the formation of strong bonds between glass particles and epoxy matrix. Addition of fibrous materials can also increase the tensile strength.

Cementitious syntactic foams have also been investigated as a potential lightweight structural composite material. These materials include glass microspheres dispersed in a cement paste matrix to achieve a closed cell foam structure, instead of a metallic or a polymeric matrix. The resulting composites are reported to achieve compressive strength values larger than 30 MPa while maintaining densities lower than 1.2 g/cm3. Though the cementitious syntactic foams demonstrate superior specific strength values in comparison to most conventional cementitious materials, it is challenging to manufacture them. Generally, the hollow inclusions tend to buoy and segregate in the low shear strength and high-density fresh cement paste. Therefore, maintaining a uniform microstructure across the material must be achieved through a strict control of the composite rheology. In addition, certain glass types of microspheres may lead to an alkali silica reaction. Therefore, the adverse effects of this reaction must be considered and addressed to ensure the long-term durability of these composites. Cementitious syntactic foams have also been tested for their mechanical performance under high strain rate loading conditions to evaluate their energy dissipation capacity in crash cushions, blast walls, etc. Under these loading conditions, the glass microspheres of the cementitious syntactic foams did not show progressive crushing. Ultimately, unlike the polymeric and metallic syntactic foams, they did not emerge as suitable materials for energy dissipation applications.